News Desk
ISLAMABAD: Supreme Court on Thursday temporarily halted trial proceedings against activists Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha, who faced charges over social media posts made in 2023 alleged to breach the 2016 Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act.
The case, which has drawn significant public attention, is now set to be reviewed by the Islamabad High Court, which had earlier rejected the activists’ petitions for relief. Supporters of Mazari-Hazir and Chattha contend that the charges represent a retaliatory response to their advocacy for women’s and minority rights, while critics argue that the posts contained misleading information or could incite public unrest.
The proceedings took on an international dimension after Norwegian Ambassador Per Albert Ilsaas attended the hearing, prompting Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry to issue a formal protest. Officials accused the diplomat of violating the Vienna Convention by interfering in domestic judicial affairs. Mazari-Hazir responded by pointing out that diplomats routinely observe court proceedings without raising concerns, framing the protest as disproportionate.
Meanwhile, authorities have taken strong notice against Norwegian Ambassador for attending Iman Mazari’s hearing in Supreme Court. Foreign Office has issued a demarche to the Norwegian ambassador, citing interference in the country’s internal matters. A spokesperson said the Norwegian envoy attended the SC hearing of the Iman Mazari case on 11 November, describing it as a breach of diplomatic protocol and direct interference in Pakistan’s judicial affairs.
The spokesperson added that the presence of any foreign ambassador in ongoing domestic court proceedings constitutes a serious violation of international law. He further noted that this was not an isolated incident, alleging that various Norwegian NGOs have previously supported elements engaged in anti-Pakistan activities, providing them with platforms and backing.
Legal experts and civil society observers said the case underscores persistent tensions in Pakistan between freedom of expression, judicial oversight, and the involvement of foreign actors in domestic legal matters. It has reignited debate over how laws like the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act are applied, particularly against activists and commentators who address sensitive social and political issues.
For many, the episode illustrates the delicate balance Pakistani authorities attempt to maintain between enforcing existing regulations and respecting democratic freedoms. It also highlights how court proceedings can become focal points for broader questions about human rights, civil liberties, and international diplomatic engagement, reflecting an ongoing struggle over the limits of speech and advocacy in the country.
